Table of Contents
I would certainly include Toyota 2/3TC electric motor is someplace in the top three however with those domestics you certainly have my leading four of all time for dependability. Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never had an engine issue. Rust is a different story. When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it just seemed like a diesel.
I question exactly how hard a swap it would be to get it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time leaving it's very own method ... the 300i6 would do everything I need this truck to do patgizz wrote: 3 points in the vehicle globe refuse to break.
those ought to be held as the standard to which whatever else is determined. Virtually everything else fades in comparison. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based on the chevy stovebolt 6 obviously) Wow, as a result of the outpour of praise, it looked great so I acquired it, below's the advertisement lmk what you guys believe Oops, didn't mean to be cryptic, it slid my mind that the "5.0" was technically a 4.9 l.
first order of biz however, I'm rather big, and the steering wheel to seat is rather slim ... guy that wheel cover was not ribbed for my pleasure:-LRB- The only problem I've ever before seen with vehicles like that, are damaged shifters. Ford made them a little also tough and they would certainly snap right at the floorboard.
Keep in mind the gas mileage won't be the very best worldwide, but it will certainly damn sure run forever. Edit: I'm 6'2" and 280. I constantly had lots of space in the cab of them. wbjones composed: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 vehicle. Never ever had an engine problem.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it simply seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 mixed, 20 freeway with the OD5. I ask yourself exactly how hard a swap it would certainly be to get it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time getting out of it's very own method ... The engine bay had not been developed for anything longer than a Mod motor. One canister eliminate an engine from a '97 style F-150 from the top, however it sucks. Mod motors require to come out sidewards and you need to pull the damper and water pump off of a 4.2. The core assistance does not unlock like in F250s and later on F150s.
WonkoTheSane composed: spitfirebill composed: In reply to HappyAndy: Thanks Captain Obvious What did he state to warrant this? I'm truly curious. I didn't see anything in his reply that would need this reaction. "They are typically dependable as gravity so long as they aren't sludged up" What engine loves sludge? Knurled wrote: wbjones composed: Brian created: I miss my 4.9 truck.
Corrosion is a different tale. When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it simply sounded like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 blended, 20 freeway with the OD5. I question just how hard a swap it would be to get it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Very extremely confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek blog post, that I didn't explain ... my negative In respond to spitfirebill: I included that point because when I needed to locate a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I had to go through every one in every junkyard in South Jacket to locate one that had not been sludged up really badly.
Bernie: Which is a far better van, while we're going to speak concerning a few problems of these vans, however I I'm clearly not going to come out and say one is much better than the various other. Bernie: Well, they're basically the exact same car.
Mark: So, well, let's begin with engines after that. Allow's chat concerning engine and actually simply to specify that the model years, we're going to start from 2000 and up, you know, I indicate, these vans have been around for a long time.
And, you understand, for a version of a Chevy van has actually been around given that, you recognize, around that time also. Considering that 2000, I indicate, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s.
There's a whole lot of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 trigger plugs with strike to these engines, due to the fact that they really did not have sufficient threading in the stimulate plug, which caused issues.
Extremely really confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek message, that I really did not make clear ... my negative In reply to spitfirebill: I included that point because when I had to discover a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I had to go with every one in every junkyard in South Jacket to find one that had not been sludged up truly terribly.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're going to chat concerning a couple of problems of these vans, but I I'm clearly not going to come out and say one is much better than the other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the very same vehicle.
Mark: So, well, let's begin with engines then. Allow's talk about engine and really simply to specify that the model years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you understand, I imply, these vans have actually been around for a lengthy time.
And, you recognize, for a variation of a Chevy van has been around given that, you recognize, around that time as well. So we're not going to get back right into, into the earlier things. Given that 2000, I indicate, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are a lot a lot more preferred and I wouldn't truly suggest a V6 engine.
So, you recognize, Fords, and the majority of them include the Triton V8. There's a great deal of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 spark plugs with blow to these engines, due to the fact that they didn't have adequate threading in the ignition system, which created troubles. And usually that would certainly happen when you may be in a 15 traveler bus going up a hill with a tons of individuals and all of a sudden boom, an ignition system bulges and you're stranded.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealer near me Milwaukee, California
Ford F150 dealer around Milwaukee, California
Ford F150 dealer